Friday, December 23, 2011

I just like to smile! Smiling's my favorite.

 packages shipped.
 Parties attended

 friends hugged

 babies snuggled
 pictures posed
 Presents wrapped
dogs lives threatened

 Janie's wrath sparked at check-out.

(flames out of the sides of my face.)
Excellent article by dietitian Lucy Aphramor: "Our efforts may have been seriously misguided and even harmful."

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Why women don't breastfeed...

**note:
this post is old and I don't feel the same way in entirety that I did when I wrote this, I planned to come in here and delete, but like life that won't change the people that already read it. I am sorry if it hurt your feelings. I really am, I think all women need support in the hard job that is motherhood.


Last night the news reported that Enfamil is recalling formula after an infant death related to an undetected bacterium. And my first thought was:

You don't have to test breastmilk for bacterium.

And my mind wandered to a post on peaceful parenting facebook page asking why more women don't breastfeed. Granted initial breastfeeding rates are improving but our 6 month breastfeeding rates are pretty abysmal.

My thoughts... (Because you know I'm an expert in my own opinion):

1. Breastfeeding is HARD. It does not just come "natural". There can be latch issues - supply issues- cracked and bleeding nipples - thrush (detected and un-diagnosed) - engorgement - oversupply - tongue tie... etc.

2. It’s expected to be easy. And when its not (see above)- formula is very accessible these days - in fact formula companies have so cleverly sent you home with a can in your cute free diaper bag all but waiting for you to give up.

3. You may have never seen a baby breastfeed. And not just in the general I notice a woman is breastfeeding in the corner of the room, covered.  Other cultures and generations would have seen their mother, sister, aunt nurse a baby. You would see a latch and understand how a baby actually nurses. I remember not even being able to hold Benjamin right - I tried to hold him just like you hold a baby with his face completely upright cradled in my elbow.

4. You mother, grandmother, and Aunts mostly likely did not breastfeed and you have lost a wealth of information availability because of that. Breastfeeding is one facet of humanity that was almost completely eradicated in our modern society. There are few families with an experienced older breastfeeding mother on hand to ask questions. In fact older generations are more than willing to tell you "babies do just fine on formula - look at you!" or "that baby has teeth you're not going to keep breastfeeding are you?"

5. Modesty. How many women are not truly comfortable with their own bodies? Are you ready to handle your own breasts out in the open naked 12-15 times a day?
-How many women cover even in mother's rooms?
-How many go out to the car to nurse?
-How many go off alone to a room to nurse.
-Pre-pump so you can have a bottle and be acceptable in public.
-I read of one mom who ALWAYS fed her baby under a nursing cover so that the baby was trained to expect it and be comfortable with it even in public. How sad - babies are hardwired to gaze at mom while breastfeeding. And have you tried to eat with a blanket over your head lately?

6. Distorted sense of sexuality. I have noticed that tight clothes are A-OK - even at church the "tightness" of things are pretty much as tight as you can get before resorting to a catsuit. And what I call "stripper heels" have made quite a popular trend lately. I'm sorry but at some height of heel, it’s just immodest to me and screams of sexuality. But... breastfeeding - oh boy it just makes people sooooooo uncomfortable. Talk about feeding your baby uncovered in a public place and it comes up that your are tempting men into impure thoughts? I mean c'mon... That is insulting to men. But strut up the hall in a skin tight pencil skirt and stripper heels - "super-cute"

7. Bodily fluids. That is what some consider breastmilk and from the comments I get about my homebirth I see that bodily fluids make people come unglued... I can't tell you how many times I've heard - I don't want to touch my baby right after it’s born. Ewww.. "vag juices" p**sy juices" "blood - guts"
First off it’s not 'guts' it’s your baby and YOUR BODY. It reminds me of the analogy in Ezekiel of the abandoned baby in the field - a mother who does not touch her freshly born baby - "no one pitied thee":
 "And as for thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water to supple thee; thou wast not salted at all, nor swaddled at all.
 None eye pitied thee, to do any of these unto thee, to have compassion upon thee; but thou wast cast out in the open field, to the lothing of thy person, in the day that thou wast born.
 ¶And when I passed by thee, and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live."
 It so sad to me of thinking of a mother not touching her baby till another person has wiped it off. I remember my hospital births dying a little inside that my baby was across the room on a warmer being mishandled instead of in my arms. I had to wait FIVE hours for them to bring me Cora after I got to post-partum. That is completely unacceptable.

8. Which brings me to this situation. What harm is being done at the most sacred time of birth? There is a very strong love cocktail that develops at the time of birth especially when private and uninterrupted that is almost impossible to achieve in a modern hospital. Look at the third picture down in this post. Thank God for such a capable grandmother assisting her grandbaby to the breast - but how damaged could the breastfeeding relationship be in situations lacking that support. This video with Michael Odent captures the situation perfectly:


"Immediately after birth there is a short period of time which will never happen again, which is critical for mother/baby attachment" ... "A complex cocktail of love hormones"

How much postpartum depression is caused by how the birth goes?  We understand interfering in the animal kingdom causing disastrous consequences.

** Now as a mother who has had both very high intervention and drugged birth and natural I can testify that the difference is profound and life changing. But I also believe in my heart that a mother's heart is strong and bonding and attachment can happen in vast circumstances - c-section, adoption, birth trauma, etc... I just don't think that moment should be so damaged by unnecessary interventions when it doesn't have to be. We leave animals alone at birth - we know it can damage their relationship. But we do it to women ALL THE TIME


9. Convenience.
Some find formula very convenient. They can return to their exercise regimen/dieting. They don't have to have accessible clothes or bras. They can leave their baby for looooong periods of time.
I used formula. I did not find it convenient at all.
It was expensive.
I had to wash bottles, nipples, collars, covers.
I had to find filtered water in every area I would be at or cart it with me.
Formula poop is capital N nasty.
Formula spit ups could build a hut if straw is added and stained everything beyond repair.
Formula constipated my babies to the point of actually tearing their anal opening. I had to "experiment" on my child to find the right formula brand and then the amount of laxative that was right for their system. None of which I give a second thought while breastfeeding.
And that's not even covering the susceptibility to life long allergies and lower immunity.

BUT despite all this when I said to one mom I've done both and breastfeeding is so much easier!
She replied - but I can get so much more done when I bottle feed and I returned a confused look.
 She said "you know I can prop the bottle and cook dinner."
I said "oh I didn't prop the bottle when I bottle fed"

this kind of reminds me of this:

So let’s see all a baby loses when a bottle is propped:
- They are not getting breastmilk (unless pumped)
-the don't get the warmth of someone's body
-they don't get to interact with the person
-they don't get looked at and gazed lovingly at
And let’s talk about the head helmets:


I have two opinions on this gadget. I think one of the reasons the rate of use is so high around here is I've heard that the company that created and designs them is a Texas company. Are there some sweet kickbacks for over prescribing them? I don't know someone else can follow the money trail on this one. 

 But my biggest theory is that babies are getting to sleep in their car seats an awful lot and are bottle fed, probably propped or holding it on their own.
 I also realize that the SIDS campaign of babies "back to sleep" is a HUGE contributor. Benjamin had some of the flat head thing too - he slept in his car seat way too much... Live and learn. When he was on formula at about 9 months old a few times I held the bottle for him while he stayed in his car seat. And I regret it.

10. My last and final opinion is that formula is too easily available and commercialized. Formula companies should not have any access to new moms and should not have advertising rights. Formula should be a last option and if not prescription only at least close to it. Even with the gains in breastfeeding there is still more stigma to breastfeeding than bottle feeding.
 And if you have strong opinions against bottle feeding you are judgmental and mean. When that is not true. It’s the babies that my heart goes out to. I know mothering is hard, very, very hard.
 But like TFB puts it "We can't handle the truth about breastfeeding."


Formula is an amazing thing to have when absolutely necessary (The story of Mr. Nestle creating formula for the neighbor baby who was dying because his mother did not have milk is touching) but my heart aches for when my babies have had cold silicone nipples instead of warm flesh. Powdered milk from another mammal instead of from mom. How much do you love powdered milk?

Babies deserve the boob and to do that women need more support.
More lactation consultants. More education.
More comfort with each other to teach and show how it works.
Less stigma.
Congratulate each other for breastfeeding. It is an insult to say to me "well breastfeeding comes easy for you" NO mam. I fought for it. I worked hard and persevered.
To the lady in the restaurant who thanked me for BF'ing in public - you are awesome!

Boobies rock - lets use em!!!




Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Weight watchers... doesn't work, just to clarify.

"somebody's got to say its not ok."


Too many people have their hopes and dreams hitched to a perfectly thin version of themselves in their mind and if we dare unhitch that train we take away all hope.


HAES seems to frequently be met with opposition from the very people who would benefit vastly from learning more about it.
The most basic explanation of HAES seems like the "throw in the towel club"
And that makes many people come unglued at the seams. 
Say "diets don't work" and people are like this
And then they get all but, but, but, but .... don't you realize:
I just need to get to a "healthy weight."

face palm.

HAES seeks peace in body acceptance and health practices that will actually make you healthier - not smaller.

"But weight watchers works."

"Weight watchers has worked well for me - I lost 10,25, 40 lbs when I did it in the past."

"Its not a diet its a lifestyle change."

"Jenny Craig helped: filling in whatever celebrity endorsement here."

Weight watchers is good at helping people lose weight for a a little while.
 It is NOT maintained weight loss.
Only about 2 out of a thousand maintain weight loss with weight watchers and they were NOT fat to begin with and they only lost a small amount of weight:

excerpt from this fab post:
Each year only about 6% of Weight Watchers members (give or take) reached their goal weight (presumably 94% failed).
Now before you get all impressed with Weight Watcher’s 6% success rate, let’s step back. For one thing, the successful 6% weren’t so fat in the first place. The 2001 study says that most were between a BMI of 25-30 (i.e. “overweight” but not “obese” – to use definitions I find silly). The 2007 abstract says the average starting BMI for that study was 27 – which is well below the average Weight Watchers participant. So in order to achieve goal weight the average lifetime member probably had to lose less than 10 lbs and would have to include a lot of people who had even less to lose.
It turns out only 3.9% of the golden 6% were still at or below goal weight after 5 years. By my calculations that means 3.9%*6.3% = 0.24% or about two out of a thousand Weight Watchers participants who reached goal weight stayed there for more than five years.
When you hear diet drug claims that they “double” weight loss – it’s probably true – they probably had a study where their 2 lb weight loss doubled the average of 1 lb weight loss.
Which is why a popular topic for weight loss researchers to write about these days is whether “unrealistic weight loss expectations” matter. This is code for “should we feel guilty about the fact that when we talk about ‘success’ we’ve come to mean something completely different from what the public’s been duped into thinking we mean?”
I have a two-word answer: informed consent
(end of excerpt)
do you really know what you are getting into when you join weight watchers or the see who can lose the most weight at work competition?
What if there was really truth in advertising about diets:
Why do we call it the “weight loss industry” when what we really get for our time, sacrifice, and money is weight cycling? 19 times out of 20, what we are really purchasing is the experience of weight loss and regain.
Imagine if we called it the “weight cycling industry,” and “weight cycling programs.”  Would you participate in Weight Cyclers at work?  Buy food from NutriCycle?  Hire a trainer from the Biggest Weight Cycler?
Because that is what we are doing, folks.  Better face the facts:  Of 100 people trying to lose weight, the vast majority of people will regain weight. Some significant group – perhaps a third – will gain more weight than they lost.  Some tiny number (7? 5? 3?)  will maintain their weight loss, and of that group, some number from 0-4 of them will be flirting with, developing, or fortifying an eating disorder.  Yes, you read me right.
(end of excerpt)

this can be a very, very difficult pill to swallow. Being fat carries such huge bags of shame that people will do almost anything to rid themselves of that shame.
A lifetime of tugging at clothes, wishing you looked different, trying and trying and trying to be thinner is hard to let go of just because someone says "be happy just the way you are!"
But I do implore you to consider learning more about HAES especially if you are thinking about a new years diet.
This year consider giving up.
But only on the diets! NOT ON YOURSELF.
If you have any plans of what you will do when you do lose "the weight" Please, Please make 2012 the year that you DO IT ANYWAY.
Drive past weight watchers. Don't pool your money at work.
Instead take that dance class. Get a massage. Go on a date. Take that vacation. Whatever it is you daydreamed about the "thin-you" doing - GO DO IT!!!!!!!!!!
Struggling with the "thin-you" waiting to break out? read this:



And can we stop doing this to our children? This is at the play area of willow bend mall.
It made my blood boil.
Not only that body shaming starts so young it was in a place that should be a carefree area of play.
And worst of all there was an ACTUAL damn scale. Like truly find out how much you weigh.
(it was broken - thank goodness)

it even looks like Taz is teasing you.

we start our body shaming young these days.


Want to really do something great for your health:


Please click on the labels below to read all my posts about Health at every Size.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Tis the season for band.

Tis the season for performances. Ella performed with the Honor Choir at the local mall and Prosper Country Christmas
Benjamin performed in the Middle School Band's Christmas concert. The middle school band is so big they perform at the high school and they have to split into two bands with two different performances.
 see him back there?







 Ella made those iced sugar cookies completely from scratch. I'm talking royal icing from SCRATCH and I did not help AT ALL. Like I wasn't even in the kitchen. 
Letting your little ones help in the kitchen pays dividends folks!
 Though Kyle says I need to make Benjamin help more. He says the 11 year old boys have to cook their own food on campouts and watching them all struggle to dice potatoes was pretty hard. You don't really saw back and forth to chop potatoes.


 A man that can rock a baby to sleep and then holds him through the game because he enjoys the warm baby cuddles.... that man is a keeper.
and with a beard.. seriously, seriously sexy.
Like I need him to give me more babies sexy.

(confession here... I LOVE the song 5 o'clock in the morning.** And the older kids get the gist of the song so I  totally wig them out by singing it to Kyle.
 like screaming "MOOOMMMMM.. eww. gross")

cracks.
me.
up.

its good to know your parents are madly in love.

This song wigs them out too: Gimme some lovin.

** standard MTV fare not really safe for kids.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

It is easy to scare women about their bodies.

You see this lady right here is one of my heros - If I got to meet her I think I'd bear hug her and spin her around the room. Her book was one of the biggest sources of strength for me second to the Book of Mormon in preparing for natural childbirth.

She is a beatnick turned midwife who tirelessly recorded data of the births she tended. And has become one of the most renowned midwives in the world who even has a technique named after her for safely getting a baby out with shoulder dystocia. The Gaskin Manuever.


She was recently awarded a Right livelihood Award also known as the "altenative Nobel"...Her acceptance speech was an amazing critque of the current state of affairs in modern obstetrics. Here are some of my favorite excerpts:

"When surgical and technological interventions in birth become the norm rather than the exception, the profession of midwifery loses its basis for existence, and obstetrics itself no longer encompasses the skills and knowledge that were once considered essential competencies of the profession.


What is often missed is that excessive cesarean rates have other negative consequences than the loss of midwifery and obstetrical knowledge and skills. Simply put, as rates rise beyond 15-20%, more women die from complications such as pulmonary embolism, infection, hemorrhage, and a sharp increase in placental complications in subsequent pregnancies. None of the countries with the highest cesarean rates can report on low maternal death rates. This is especially true of the U.S., where women now face at least twice the chance of dying from pregnancy-related causes as their mothers did. In California, between 1996 and 2006, the maternal death rate tripled, with much of the increase being attributed to an excess of cesareans. 


If all countries put the welfare of mothers and babies at the center of maternity care policy, midwifery would have to grow strong again. In some countries, such as my own, it will be necessary to greatly increase the number of midwives as just one of the ways to prevent complications and to reduce rates of medical intervention in birth. We’ll need lots of doulas as we make this transition. Midwives need to have a say in the major issues surrounding birth. In countries where they currently work under the intense domination of obstetricians, the work will be to bring the relationship back to one of balance. Midwives cannot allow obstetricians to bully them, because doing so is almost certain to mean that laboring women will be the next ones to be bullied. 


Attempts to make home birth illegal in any country will only distract from the real problems and exacerbate them, since planned home birth for healthy women provides a necessary safety valve for women who want a wider range of choice than their hospital might offer and a learning opportunity for midwives to learn about women in their natural state. Home birth midwives must be able to make a living from their work, and insurance companies should not be permitted to keep home birth midwives from being compensated for their work. Home birth midwives are being persecuted in almost every country, even in The Netherlands, where home birth services have a long and honorable tradition. I believe the development of a country can be measured by the degree to which it respects the right of a birthing mother to receive a woman centered birthing experience, whether the birth occurs in a home or hospital setting. 


Birth shouldn’t be thought of as money-making commodity or condition in which large institutions or governments control and dictate how women will give birth, ignoring individual mother’s wishes and needs. Inevitably, this too often puts bullies in charge of women’s bodies, something no other mammalian species allows. Some countries have midwives who are totally subordinate to physicians. In these countries, it’s typical for very harsh methods of birth care to be applied, and outcomes show this. It’s time to stop this sort of behavior. Traditional peoples, indigenous people don’t permit such behavior. We need to learn from them."





if you are pregnant you want her books on your wishlist this Christmas! Here they all are.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

God sent me at the right time.


A thought occured to me while in the bathtub tonight.  Breastfeeding amenorrhea has ended so I could conceive... but I need to avoid morning sickness until after my little sister's wedding in March. So this means a window has closed. If I'd got pregnant before the first of the year I'd deliver before my 35th birthday.

But now if we are so blessed to have another child I will deliver under the umbrella of what modern medicine calls "Advanced Maternal Age".

Ugh.

It kind of reminds me of when I first realized I am considered "morbidly obese"
Advanced maternal age just sounds so...

ominous.

I'll ignore the fear that can come with titles like that. But there is a part of me that is sad to think my reproductive years are winding down. Now that I have an 11 year old. Five years doesn't seem so long after all. I don't know when menopause will start for me (I come from a long line of women who had to have early hysterectomies so I really don't know) but regardless, 40 isn't too far off.
And no matter what we ever do, I will ALWAYS want options. Ya know if I want a baby at 90 then I want a baby. (I'm joking...well maybe.)

I regret the years on birth control hormones and the IUD. They were decisions that felt right at the time when life seemed so long and money so short. But now I realize like sands through the hour glass... my potential for childbearing is but a short part of my life. And my heart breaks so much for the those who go through infertility. I really can't imagine the heartbreak. Its the one thing that makes me want to punch God in the face. And that may be blasphemy but its true. A woman right now somewhere is terminating a pregnancy or neglecting a child while other women cry themselves to sleep hoping that this month will be the month. I know there are answers to quell my anger with the Man above.. but I'll just have to take it up with him myself.

Facing my future, whatever it will be, made glad I am living in this time and place.

I used to be convinced I was born in the wrong era. I should have been born some time where I could take my attitude and be, ya know: radical.

I like to think I would have been on the front lines of the civil rights movement.

I would have made a good early LDS pioneer. I'm hearty. I can walk and walk and walk. I can birth without drugs.

I would have been a good hippie. I like the music. I love activism - just give me a cause and I fight for it.  Long wild hair and skirts and Bob Dylan. I'm so there.

I would have been a good early feminist. Janie vs. inequality.

Me and the status quo don't get along so well. If the majority start to agree I start to question. I don't mind if my choices stand out. So maybe I wasn't born in the wrong time or place after all. I live in a time where the choice to be completely "traditional" : at home, pregnant in the kitchen, with lots of babies, is in and of itself radical.



Wednesday, December 07, 2011

Monday, December 05, 2011

the one thing I would INSIST on in ANY birth

A pet topic of mine has made a resurgence in the news lately. Funny when 'back to basics' becomes new science.

There is a new video up explaining the benefits of delayed cord clamping by Penny Simkin.
Penny Simkin is amazing - her videos of relaxation techniques really helped Kyle and I prepare for natural birth. anywho back to the topic at hand:

Immediate cord clamping is like having a major blood hemorrhage for the baby.

Babies that get their cord blood have increased iron levels at 4 months old! Article HERE

Even if baby needs resuscitation that can be done on mom's chest and they need that blood and oxygen even MORE SO!
poor little Cora :(

Jaundice - I can only offer anecdotal evidence but of five babies the only one who did not have jaundice was PJ and he didn't have his cord cut until after the placenta was delivered.

Delayed cord clamping CAN be done in a c-section. - they can wait holding the baby there for 2 minutes. It may freak out the nurses but it can be done.

If you have a precipitous delivery (don't make it to the hospital/birth center) in time. Please do not tie off the cord - especially with a dirty shoe lace - yuck. Don't let the paramedics clamp either, Wrap baby up with placenta when/if it comes and go to where you intended to birth. Be warned no discount if you birth in the car even if they do nothing but let you shower at the hospital and you have to pay to get your car detailed LOL.




 I did a comparison video of  PJ and Cora's birth (I'd love to add video of Benjamins but its a non-PG shot and rather violent forceps delivery) In this video I show the difference in how the cord was handled. - the video is silent to start, there is much more footage of pushing than in my original birth video and the complete third stage (delivery of placenta) which is not easy to find in homebirth videos:

Saturday, December 03, 2011

Dr. Oz rubs his eyes real stressed out like.

Dr. Oz (he doesn't deserve such a cool name - I should see about revoking his rights)
hosted Dr. Glenn Gaesser on his show to discuss...

cue jaws theme...


dun...dun...DUNNNN...


Obesity is not the health crisis that we think it is. Click on that link to see the episode. - its choice in the most ridiculous sense. Dr. Oz gets so mad he keeps rubbing his forehead and just guffawing at the fact that you might be able to be fat & fit.

Keep in mind he makes his LIVING off of scaring people about their health. In fact he opens with saying the majority of americans are dying from one thing and one thing only - THEIR WEIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!

Breathe free thin folks, you get to live forever!!!

Gaesser got an invite to the show after he left this youtube video response to a previous episode.

Bread = crack?



Now once you see the episode ( its in the link up there - I can't embed because then we'd miss out on the weight loss plugs on his website) you can watch Ragen's rebuttal:



Please read her blog here to partake in more of her awesomeness!

Remember in all of this Doctors are not immune to the same crap info about weight and health that all of us are subject too. Dietitians and nutritionists either. Research has been hidden for years on this. Don't ever turn your own instinct over to someone because they have more education than you or are a professional - unless what they are selling makes sense. For me Dr. Linda and Dr. Gaesser make sense. Dr. Oz is a toddler having a tantrum because his meal ticket is being threatened.

It benefits no industry to say its not that big of a deal what size you are -

eat healthy and move your body.

got it?